{"id":4433,"date":"2017-11-29T17:54:45","date_gmt":"2017-11-29T20:54:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/?p=4433"},"modified":"2017-11-29T18:08:49","modified_gmt":"2017-11-29T21:08:49","slug":"the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/","title":{"rendered":"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/2&#8243;][vc_column_text]The Appeals Chamber today pronounced its judgement in\u00a0<em>Prosecutor v. Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107\u00a0et al.<\/em>, in what was the Tribunal\u2019s most voluminous appeal as well as its final\u00a0case.<\/p>\n<p>The Appeals Chamber affirmed almost all of the Trial Chamber\u2019s convictions of Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107, Bruno Stoji\u0107, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj\u00a0Petkovi\u0107, Valentin \u0106ori\u0107, and Berislav\u00a0Pu\u0161i\u0107 with respect to events occurring between 1992 and 1994 in eight municipalities and five detention centres in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It also affirmed the sentences imposed by the Trial Chamber, which sentenced Prli\u0107 to 25 years\u2019 imprisonment, Stoji\u0107, Praljak, and Petkovi\u0107 to 20 years\u2019 imprisonment each, \u0106ori\u0107 to 16\u00a0years\u2019 imprisonment, and Pu\u0161i\u0107 to 10 years\u2019 imprisonment.<\/p>\n<p>Prli\u0107, Stoji\u0107, Praljak, Petkovi\u0107, \u0106ori\u0107, and Pu\u0161i\u0107 remain convicted of crimes against humanity, violations of the laws or customs of war, and grave breaches of the Geneva\u00a0Conventions, specifically murder, wilful killing, persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds, deportation, unlawful transfer of civilians, imprisonment, unlawful confinement of civilians, unlawful labour, inhumane acts, inhuman treatment, extensive destruction of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly, destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to religion or education, unlawful attack on civilians, and unlawful infliction of terror on civilians. In addition, Prli\u0107, Stoji\u0107, Petkovi\u0107, and \u0106ori\u0107 remain convicted of rape, inhuman treatment (sexual assault), extensive appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly, and plunder of public or private property through the third category of joint criminal enterprise liability. Praljak also remains convicted of extensive appropriation of property not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly, and plunder of public or private property through the third category of joint criminal enterprise liability. \u0106ori\u0107 further remains convicted of a number of crimes under superior responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>The Appeals Chamber also affirmed the Trial Chamber\u2019s conclusion that, from mid\u2011January 1993, the accused were participants in a joint criminal enterprise, with the exception of Pu\u0161i\u0107 who joined in April 1993. The Appeals Chamber further affirmed the Trial\u00a0Chamber\u2019s conclusion that this joint criminal enterprise was aimed at creating a Croatian entity in Bosnia and Herzegovina that would facilitate the reunification of the Croatian people, through ethnic cleansing of the Muslim population.<\/p>\n<p>The Appeals Chamber granted some grounds of appeal by Stoji\u0107, Praljak, Petkovi\u0107, \u0106ori\u0107, and the Prosecution, while dismissing in their entirety the appeals raised by Prli\u0107 and Pu\u0161i\u0107. As a result of granting those grounds of appeal, the Appeals Chamber reversed a limited number of findings that supported certain convictions of all six accused.<\/p>\n<p>All six accused, as well as the Prosecution had lodged appeals against the Trial\u00a0Judgement rendered by Trial Chamber III on 29 May 2013. The briefing in the case, completed on 29 May 2015, amounted to more than 12,000 pages of appellate submissions. The Appeal Hearing took place between 20 and 28 March 2017.<\/p>\n<p>The Appeals Chamber was composed of Judge Carmel Agius, Presiding, Judge\u00a0Liu\u00a0Daqun, Judge Fausto Pocar, Judge Theodor Meron, and Judge\u00a0Bakone\u00a0Justice\u00a0Moloto. Judge Liu appended a declaration, a partially dissenting opinion, and dissenting opinions. Judge Pocar appended dissenting opinions.<\/p>\n<p>Since its establishment, the Tribunal has indicted 161 persons for serious violations of humanitarian law committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001. With this final appeal, proceedings before the Tribunal against all 161 persons have now been concluded and the work of the Tribunal is completed.<\/p>\n<p>After 24 years of operation, the Tribunal will formally close on 31\u00a0December 2017.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.icty.org\/en\/press\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prli%C4%87-et-al-appeal-case\">ICTY Web Site<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/2&#8243;][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3><a href=\"http:\/\/www.icty.org\/case\/prlic\/4#acjug\">Judgement<\/a><\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.icty.org\/x\/cases\/prlic\/acjug\/en\/171129-judgement-summary.pdf\">Summary of Judgement<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/2&#8243;][vc_column_text]The Appeals Chamber today pronounced its judgement in\u00a0Prosecutor v. Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107\u00a0et al., in what was the Tribunal\u2019s most voluminous appeal as well as its final\u00a0case. The Appeals Chamber affirmed almost all of the Trial Chamber\u2019s convictions of Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107, Bruno Stoji\u0107, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj\u00a0Petkovi\u0107, Valentin \u0106ori\u0107, and Berislav\u00a0Pu\u0161i\u0107 with respect to events occurring between 1992 and 1994 in eight municipalities and five detention centres in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It also affirmed the sentences imposed by the Trial Chamber, which sentenced Prli\u0107 to 25 years\u2019 imprisonment, Stoji\u0107, Praljak, and Petkovi\u0107 to 20 years\u2019 imprisonment each, \u0106ori\u0107 to 16\u00a0years\u2019 imprisonment, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":4437,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-noticias"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case - The Observatory of International Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case - The Observatory of International Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/2&#8243;][vc_column_text]The Appeals Chamber today pronounced its judgement in\u00a0Prosecutor v. Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107\u00a0et al., in what was the Tribunal\u2019s most voluminous appeal as well as its final\u00a0case. The Appeals Chamber affirmed almost all of the Trial Chamber\u2019s convictions of Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107, Bruno Stoji\u0107, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj\u00a0Petkovi\u0107, Valentin \u0106ori\u0107, and Berislav\u00a0Pu\u0161i\u0107 with respect to events occurring between 1992 and 1994 in eight municipalities and five detention centres in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It also affirmed the sentences imposed by the Trial Chamber, which sentenced Prli\u0107 to 25 years\u2019 imprisonment, Stoji\u0107, Praljak, and Petkovi\u0107 to 20 years\u2019 imprisonment each, \u0106ori\u0107 to 16\u00a0years\u2019 imprisonment, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Observatory of International Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/theobservatoryofinternationallaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-29T20:54:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-29T21:08:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"725\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"The Observatory of International Law\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@The_OILaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@The_OILaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"The Observatory of International Law\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/\",\"name\":\"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case - The Observatory of International Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-29T20:54:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-29T21:08:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9cf6482321c7595774d814c26e7cd50c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es-AR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-AR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":725},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Inicio\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/\",\"name\":\"The Observatory of International Law\",\"description\":\"Interesting things in International Law\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"es-AR\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9cf6482321c7595774d814c26e7cd50c\",\"name\":\"The Observatory of International Law\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-AR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/log2-100x100.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/log2-100x100.png\",\"caption\":\"The Observatory of International Law\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/author\/the-observatory-of-international-law\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case - The Observatory of International Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case - The Observatory of International Law","og_description":"[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/2&#8243;][vc_column_text]The Appeals Chamber today pronounced its judgement in\u00a0Prosecutor v. Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107\u00a0et al., in what was the Tribunal\u2019s most voluminous appeal as well as its final\u00a0case. The Appeals Chamber affirmed almost all of the Trial Chamber\u2019s convictions of Jadranko\u00a0Prli\u0107, Bruno Stoji\u0107, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj\u00a0Petkovi\u0107, Valentin \u0106ori\u0107, and Berislav\u00a0Pu\u0161i\u0107 with respect to events occurring between 1992 and 1994 in eight municipalities and five detention centres in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It also affirmed the sentences imposed by the Trial Chamber, which sentenced Prli\u0107 to 25 years\u2019 imprisonment, Stoji\u0107, Praljak, and Petkovi\u0107 to 20 years\u2019 imprisonment each, \u0106ori\u0107 to 16\u00a0years\u2019 imprisonment, [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/","og_site_name":"The Observatory of International Law","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/theobservatoryofinternationallaw\/","article_published_time":"2017-11-29T20:54:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-29T21:08:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":725,"url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"The Observatory of International Law","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@The_OILaw","twitter_site":"@The_OILaw","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"The Observatory of International Law","Tiempo de lectura":"3 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/","url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/","name":"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case - The Observatory of International Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg","datePublished":"2017-11-29T20:54:45+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-29T21:08:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9cf6482321c7595774d814c26e7cd50c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es-AR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-AR","@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg","width":1280,"height":725},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/29\/the-icty-renders-its-final-judgement-in-the-prlic-et-al-appeal-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Inicio","item":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The ICTY renders its final judgement in the Prli\u0107 et al. appeal case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/","name":"The Observatory of International Law","description":"Interesting things in International Law","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"es-AR"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9cf6482321c7595774d814c26e7cd50c","name":"The Observatory of International Law","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-AR","@id":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/log2-100x100.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/log2-100x100.png","caption":"The Observatory of International Law"},"url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/author\/the-observatory-of-international-law\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/prlic-et-al-appeal-judgement-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4433"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4433"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4433\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4439,"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4433\/revisions\/4439"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theinternationalobservatory.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}